鈥淲e were greatly astonished, when we saw Eleazar engaged in the service of the Temple, at the mode of his dress, and the majesty of his appearance鈥 (which) created such awe and confusion of mind as to make one feel that one had come into the presence of a man who belonged to a different world.鈥 So writes the author of the Letter of Aristeas, about meeting the High Priest Eleazar, who lived 260鈥245 BCE. The multicolored garments of the Kohen Gadol (High Priest) were of such 鈥渃onspicuous beauty鈥, that they left all observers 鈥渁mazed鈥 at the spectacle they had seen.
Making an impression was the very purpose of the uniform of all the kohanim. The Rambam says that for the kohanim, the clothes make the man. (A kohen without his uniform was prohibited from participating in the service). The Rambam writes in the Guide for the Perplexed that the average person who visited the Beit Hamikdash (Temple) would judge the kohanim by their clothes, 鈥..because the multitude does not estimate man by his true form but by the perfection of his bodily limbs and the beauty of his garments..鈥. Image is critical for the kohanim; they must strike an aristocratic pose, be well groomed, (kohanim were required to take regular haircuts), and wear beautiful, well maintained garments. Kohanim must court public opinion, and inspire the multitude.
The regal bearing of the kohen stands in sharp contrast with another biblical leader, the navi (prophet). Amos describes himself 鈥渁 cattle herder and a tender of sycamore figs.鈥澛 Eliyahu is described as 鈥渁 hairy man,….with a leather belt tied around his waist.鈥; this great navi has long hair and wears a working man鈥檚 clothes. The neviim had a very different aesthetic than the kohanim, and their attire reflects a fundamental difference between them.
Ahad Ha’am wrote an influential essay contrasting the kohen and navi. He explains that they represent 鈥渢wo ways of doing service in the cause of an idea鈥, and that 鈥渢he navi is a one-sided figure, who wants to make dramatic change. The kohen is essentially the follower of the navi, who attempts to preserve the navi鈥檚 vision within the realities of society.鈥
A navi focuses single mindedly on his idea. 鈥淎 certain moral idea fills his whole being,…. He can only see the world through the mirror of his idea鈥is whole life is spent in fighting for this ideal with all his strength.鈥 The navi is not interested in popularity contests, and many neviim had their lives threatened by the powers that be. Not so the Kohen; his job is to ensure that these ideals are broadly accepted. Ahad Ha鈥檃m explains that 鈥渋nstead of clinging to the narrowness of the navi, and demanding of reality what it cannot give, (the kohen) broadens his outlook, and takes a wider view 鈥.Not what ought to be, but what can be, is what he seeks.鈥 The navi is fixated on a divine vision, and little else matters to him; the kohen is a teacher, trying to coax everyone a bit closer to the ideal. The kohen must be a master of persuasion and public relations; and for that reason, he needs to tend carefully to his image, and ensure that his garments and grooming are presentable.聽
The kohen has a complex mission. He is the middleman who connects man to God, the one who brings sacrifices to God and atonement to man. And like any intermediary, there is a question of where the kohen鈥檚 primary loyalties and responsibilities lie. The Talmud ponders this question and wants to know if the kohanim are 鈥渙ur emissaries, or the emissaries of God?鈥 Being a middleman means that the kohen is pulled in two opposite directions.
In Rabbinic literature, the human centered mission of the kohen is emphasized. Aharon, the first kohen, is one who 鈥渓oves peace and pursues peace, loves mankind and draws them close to the Torah.鈥 The kohen offers the birkat kohanim (the priestly blessing) to the community, and must do so with love. For this reason, a kohen who has taken a life is disqualified from giving birkat kohanim.
Hillel, the great rabbi of the mishnah, saw the kohen as a role model for the rabbinic community. Hillel advocated that one ought to 鈥渂e a student of Aharon鈥, and like Aharon and the kohanim, focus on personal connections. Hillel himself was a transformative leader because like Aharon, he was humble, open and embracing. Unlike the navi, Hillel did not rebuke and reject.
However, being a people-centered man of God can lead to serious failures. Being constantly focussed on public opinion can cause the kohen to lose sight of his ultimate responsibilities; love of the community can cross the line to pandering. Aharon may be a master of personal connections, but that personality trait causes his greatest failure. When the people ask for a Golden Calf, Aharon obliges them; he doesn鈥檛 challenge their request, and avoids confrontation and controversy. In this critical moment, Aharon is too responsive to the desires of the community.
This is the kohen鈥檚 dilemma: how to connect to the crowd without losing sight of your unique vision. 聽
This is the kohen鈥檚 dilemma: how to connect to the crowd without losing sight of your unique vision.
Contemporary rabbis are more or less made in the image of the kohen. Yes, there are some rabbis who stand high in the pulpit to issue fire and brimstone speeches that rebuke their wayward flocks. There are communities where words of mussar, of serious self criticism, are welcome. But for the most part, in order to succeed, contemporary rabbis must be diplomatic and discerning, and relate to the community they live in. As Solomon Schechter put it in the 1920鈥檚, 鈥淵ou can鈥檛 be a rabbi in America without understanding baseball.鈥 Today鈥檚 rabbi may not have the kohen鈥檚 wardrobe, but he shares the same mission: to make a positive impression, and in doing so, bring people closer to Torah.
Today, American rabbis are very much a part of their community. As American Jewry diminishes in commitment and observance, the question is how rabbis will respond. When the flock keeps wandering, will the rabbi follow them?
In 2018, Jack Wertheimer published The New American Judaism, a book about how contemporary Jews practice Judaism. Wertheimer conducted 160 in-depth interviews with rabbis of every denomination, and this forms the foundation of the book. In it, you can hear the frustrations of rabbis who don鈥檛 know what they should do next; one laments they cannot get children to attend synagogue programs because 鈥渢he God of soccer is a jealous God鈥. When Wertheimer summarizes some of the assumptions that his interviewees held, you can see how their context shapes their thinking. There is an expectation that synagogues must model themselves after successful businesses; they must be innovative, and expert in marketing and customer service. Time honored traditions are modified to cater to a congregation that is increasingly strapped for time.
Marketing has significant religious value; the Talmud stresses making sure that ritual objects are pleasing to the eye, and make a 鈥渂eautiful sukka, a beautiful lulav, a beautiful shofar, beautiful ritual fringes, beautiful鈥orah scroll, and鈥 wrap the scroll in beautiful silk fabric鈥. But when there is a lack of religious commitment, the kohen鈥檚 dilemma becomes a serious challenge. One can survey the congregation to find what is popular. But that can lead to an unchallenging Judaism, one that is innocuous and banal, an amalgam of nostalgia and good feelings. Wertheimer calls this 鈥渁n ersatz form of Judaism鈥’, which re-brands popular tastes and popular political stances as a form of religious expression. It is imperative for a religious leader to meet people where they are; but the belief that 鈥渢he customer is always right鈥 is a poor fit for Judaism, which is about challenging man to achieve his best. In a market driven culture, the rabbi is pulled between public relations and pandering.
The kohen is a man of the people. But what happens when the people are no longer interested? This is the kohen鈥檚 dilemma, and one that every American Jew needs to ponder.
Rabbi Chaim Steinmetz is the Senior Rabbi of Congregation Kehilath Jeshurun in New York.
The Kohen’s Dillema: Should Judaism Pander to the Crowd?
Chaim Steinmetz
鈥淲e were greatly astonished, when we saw Eleazar engaged in the service of the Temple, at the mode of his dress, and the majesty of his appearance鈥 (which) created such awe and confusion of mind as to make one feel that one had come into the presence of a man who belonged to a different world.鈥 So writes the author of the Letter of Aristeas, about meeting the High Priest Eleazar, who lived 260鈥245 BCE. The multicolored garments of the Kohen Gadol (High Priest) were of such 鈥渃onspicuous beauty鈥, that they left all observers 鈥渁mazed鈥 at the spectacle they had seen.
Making an impression was the very purpose of the uniform of all the kohanim. The Rambam says that for the kohanim, the clothes make the man. (A kohen without his uniform was prohibited from participating in the service). The Rambam writes in the Guide for the Perplexed that the average person who visited the Beit Hamikdash (Temple) would judge the kohanim by their clothes, 鈥..because the multitude does not estimate man by his true form but by the perfection of his bodily limbs and the beauty of his garments..鈥. Image is critical for the kohanim; they must strike an aristocratic pose, be well groomed, (kohanim were required to take regular haircuts), and wear beautiful, well maintained garments. Kohanim must court public opinion, and inspire the multitude.
The regal bearing of the kohen stands in sharp contrast with another biblical leader, the navi (prophet). Amos describes himself 鈥渁 cattle herder and a tender of sycamore figs.鈥澛 Eliyahu is described as 鈥渁 hairy man,….with a leather belt tied around his waist.鈥; this great navi has long hair and wears a working man鈥檚 clothes. The neviim had a very different aesthetic than the kohanim, and their attire reflects a fundamental difference between them.
Ahad Ha’am wrote an influential essay contrasting the kohen and navi. He explains that they represent 鈥渢wo ways of doing service in the cause of an idea鈥, and that 鈥渢he navi is a one-sided figure, who wants to make dramatic change. The kohen is essentially the follower of the navi, who attempts to preserve the navi鈥檚 vision within the realities of society.鈥
A navi focuses single mindedly on his idea. 鈥淎 certain moral idea fills his whole being,…. He can only see the world through the mirror of his idea鈥is whole life is spent in fighting for this ideal with all his strength.鈥 The navi is not interested in popularity contests, and many neviim had their lives threatened by the powers that be. Not so the Kohen; his job is to ensure that these ideals are broadly accepted. Ahad Ha鈥檃m explains that 鈥渋nstead of clinging to the narrowness of the navi, and demanding of reality what it cannot give, (the kohen) broadens his outlook, and takes a wider view 鈥.Not what ought to be, but what can be, is what he seeks.鈥 The navi is fixated on a divine vision, and little else matters to him; the kohen is a teacher, trying to coax everyone a bit closer to the ideal. The kohen must be a master of persuasion and public relations; and for that reason, he needs to tend carefully to his image, and ensure that his garments and grooming are presentable.聽
The kohen has a complex mission. He is the middleman who connects man to God, the one who brings sacrifices to God and atonement to man. And like any intermediary, there is a question of where the kohen鈥檚 primary loyalties and responsibilities lie. The Talmud ponders this question and wants to know if the kohanim are 鈥渙ur emissaries, or the emissaries of God?鈥 Being a middleman means that the kohen is pulled in two opposite directions.
In Rabbinic literature, the human centered mission of the kohen is emphasized. Aharon, the first kohen, is one who 鈥渓oves peace and pursues peace, loves mankind and draws them close to the Torah.鈥 The kohen offers the birkat kohanim (the priestly blessing) to the community, and must do so with love. For this reason, a kohen who has taken a life is disqualified from giving birkat kohanim.
Hillel, the great rabbi of the mishnah, saw the kohen as a role model for the rabbinic community. Hillel advocated that one ought to 鈥渂e a student of Aharon鈥, and like Aharon and the kohanim, focus on personal connections. Hillel himself was a transformative leader because like Aharon, he was humble, open and embracing. Unlike the navi, Hillel did not rebuke and reject.
However, being a people-centered man of God can lead to serious failures. Being constantly focussed on public opinion can cause the kohen to lose sight of his ultimate responsibilities; love of the community can cross the line to pandering. Aharon may be a master of personal connections, but that personality trait causes his greatest failure. When the people ask for a Golden Calf, Aharon obliges them; he doesn鈥檛 challenge their request, and avoids confrontation and controversy. In this critical moment, Aharon is too responsive to the desires of the community.
This is the kohen鈥檚 dilemma: how to connect to the crowd without losing sight of your unique vision. 聽
Contemporary rabbis are more or less made in the image of the kohen. Yes, there are some rabbis who stand high in the pulpit to issue fire and brimstone speeches that rebuke their wayward flocks. There are communities where words of mussar, of serious self criticism, are welcome. But for the most part, in order to succeed, contemporary rabbis must be diplomatic and discerning, and relate to the community they live in. As Solomon Schechter put it in the 1920鈥檚, 鈥淵ou can鈥檛 be a rabbi in America without understanding baseball.鈥 Today鈥檚 rabbi may not have the kohen鈥檚 wardrobe, but he shares the same mission: to make a positive impression, and in doing so, bring people closer to Torah.
Today, American rabbis are very much a part of their community. As American Jewry diminishes in commitment and observance, the question is how rabbis will respond. When the flock keeps wandering, will the rabbi follow them?
In 2018, Jack Wertheimer published The New American Judaism, a book about how contemporary Jews practice Judaism. Wertheimer conducted 160 in-depth interviews with rabbis of every denomination, and this forms the foundation of the book. In it, you can hear the frustrations of rabbis who don鈥檛 know what they should do next; one laments they cannot get children to attend synagogue programs because 鈥渢he God of soccer is a jealous God鈥. When Wertheimer summarizes some of the assumptions that his interviewees held, you can see how their context shapes their thinking. There is an expectation that synagogues must model themselves after successful businesses; they must be innovative, and expert in marketing and customer service. Time honored traditions are modified to cater to a congregation that is increasingly strapped for time.
Marketing has significant religious value; the Talmud stresses making sure that ritual objects are pleasing to the eye, and make a 鈥渂eautiful sukka, a beautiful lulav, a beautiful shofar, beautiful ritual fringes, beautiful鈥orah scroll, and鈥 wrap the scroll in beautiful silk fabric鈥. But when there is a lack of religious commitment, the kohen鈥檚 dilemma becomes a serious challenge. One can survey the congregation to find what is popular. But that can lead to an unchallenging Judaism, one that is innocuous and banal, an amalgam of nostalgia and good feelings. Wertheimer calls this 鈥渁n ersatz form of Judaism鈥’, which re-brands popular tastes and popular political stances as a form of religious expression. It is imperative for a religious leader to meet people where they are; but the belief that 鈥渢he customer is always right鈥 is a poor fit for Judaism, which is about challenging man to achieve his best. In a market driven culture, the rabbi is pulled between public relations and pandering.
The kohen is a man of the people. But what happens when the people are no longer interested? This is the kohen鈥檚 dilemma, and one that every American Jew needs to ponder.
Rabbi Chaim Steinmetz is the Senior Rabbi of Congregation Kehilath Jeshurun in New York.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You鈥檙e Not a Bad 91传媒 Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
A Rabbi Explains What鈥檚 91传媒 About ‘The Odyssey’
Tu b’Av and Redemption
Mission to the 91传媒 Community of Ethiopia
LA28: Inside the Race to Host One of the World鈥檚 Biggest Sporting Events
The Myth of the Marxist Mishpacha
Professors Should Fight Campus Jew-Hatred as Educators, Not Bureaucrats
Framing the Faith of Maimonides
In this enriching new edition of the classic code of 91传媒 law, readers can delve deeply into the mind of Maimonides, from his analysis of the commandments to the controversies that have accompanied his writings, offering a window into the wisdom of one of our tradition鈥檚 preeminent thinkers.
Hope in Faith, Faith in Hope
Will Americans ever regain trust in our institutions? I think so.
Finding Communal Comfort
In the book of Isaiah, God calls the prophet to comfort the 91传媒 people. But we know this is really something we must do for one another.
Leaving Behind a Better World
The America my generation seems to be leaving our kids and grandkids is not safer nor saner, and it breaks my heart.
Boy George Releases Song Calling Out Israel鈥檚 Critics
The Culture Club singer shared a new song, 鈥淲e Will Dance Again,鈥 while calling out fellow musicians鈥 鈥渟elective memories鈥 and 鈥渕outhing like sheep.鈥
Was Our Golden Age Fool鈥檚 Gold?
We didn鈥檛 think that we were living in a 鈥淕olden Age,鈥 because it did not occur to us that what we were experiencing was only a temporary respite from centuries of animosity and intolerance.
Genocide Shmenocide
Since Israel evacuated Gaza in 2005, the Palestinian population has grown from 1.3 million to 2.1 million. In the West Bank, it has grown from 2.4 million to 3.4 million. If the Israelis were hellbent on committing genocide, it鈥檚 one of the most epic failures in military history.
Bibi鈥檚 Visit: Spin in the Air, Facts on the Ground
From Trump鈥檚 standpoint, the nuclear issue has been overtaken by the bedeviling problem of the Strait of Hormuz. What Trump sees now in Iran is a mess, not a victory.
The Obsession with Israel Is Becoming Creepy
The world鈥檚 fanatical fixation with a group that is less that 0.2 percent of the world鈥檚 population has crossed the boundaries of moral vocabulary and into creepiness.
What Will It Take?
An open revolt for 91传媒 rights and protections is going to have to come from Jews finally making demands and fighting back鈥攐r not at all.
Mamdani Needs to Pay a Price for Harming Jews
It鈥檇 be one thing if Mamdani were a lowly Israelophobe with a few hundred followers. But he鈥檚 not. He鈥檚 mayor of the city with the world鈥檚 largest 91传媒 population.
Rabbis of LA | Rabbi Geller鈥檚 Feminist Education
Third of three parts
Rabbi Artson Honored by WLCJ, Mem Global鈥檚 Embark Names Executive Director
Notable people and events in the 91传媒 LA community.
I Can鈥檛 Always 鈥 A poem for Parsha Va鈥檈tchanan
You Can鈥檛 Always Get What You Want came out the year after I was born.
A Bisl Torah 鈥 Senseless versus Sensible
The 9th of Av is an annual reminder to look inward and ask if any hatred has taken root within our hearts.
Moment in Time: Tisha B鈥橝v – A Time to Comfort
Poussin鈥檚 Menorah Chimes Without Jews at Midnight
Print Issue: Haredim at War | July 24, 2026
The Haredim who break out of their bubbles to join the IDF are often caught between faith, family and country. Here are some of their stories.
The Inversion of History
Molly Crabapple has written a work of great inversion and of ultimate betrayal.
From 鈥楾he Chosen鈥 to 鈥業maging Torah鈥: Jeremy Kagan鈥檚 Journey to Bring Torah to Life
For the director/artist, creating images inspired by Torah is a way of engaging with the stories, ideas and interpretations that have shaped 91传媒 life for thousands of years.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.