It has been 18 months since the horrific events of October 7th. As the war between Israel and Gaza enters a new phase, the language we employ carries increasingly important implications. Words matter鈥攏ot just within narrative wars shaping public opinion, but for diplomatic, jurisprudential, and historical reasons. Using the wrong words deepens the crisis; finding the right words could end it sooner.
The prevailing global narrative casts Israel as the instigator while overlooking a crucial fact: Gaza through its leadership, Hamas, initiated this war through a coordinated attack on military and civilian targets on October 7th, 2023. This attack was a premeditated “casus belli”鈥攁 deliberate provocation that formally triggered an “International Armed Conflict” governed by “International Humanitarian Law.”
This war is not between Israel and Hamas, but between Israel and the territory of Gaza. As Gaza’s designated authority, Hamas acts on behalf of its people. Hamas positions itself as fighting for the freedom of their community, but they’ve been in authority in Gaza since 2007. Their war goal is control territory outside of their jurisdiction, which they have not rescinded since October 7th 2023, prolongs thereby prolonging the conflict in Gaza.
Israel is not at war with Gazan civilians or with Palestinians writ large. Gaza represents two million of the 15 million people who identify as Palestinian worldwide. When the war is framed as a struggle for all Palestinians, it is a dangerous call to expand the conflict well beyond Gaza.
While many in the West hear 鈥楩ree Palestine鈥 as a cry for justice, the slogan often fuels Hamas 鈥 a militant organization that thrives on continued conflict. 鈥楩ree Palestine鈥 and 鈥楻iver to the Sea鈥 are not an anti-war message, and serve as rallying cries for the expansion of war.
It鈥檚 essential to separate support for the dignity and safety of people living in Gaza from language and actions that empower those who seek Israel鈥檚 destruction. I believe it鈥檚 possible to advocate for the lives and rights of Palestinians without threatening the lives and safety of Jews.
Hamas operatives have been labeled ‘terrorists’. Although Hamas is designated as a terror organization by many countries, referring to them as ‘terrorists’ absolves their actions of full accountability according to听 international law. Terrorism typically refers to individuals and small groups acting on an ad hoc basis. What happened on October 7th was a meticulously planned military operation ordered by Gaza’s governing authority and overseen by its military command. It involved hundreds of highly trained military personnel. Whatever justification they give for these actions, it makes them fully accountable for crimes of war. It was not an isolated act of terrorism.
When viewed as a ‘casus belli’ 鈥 the cause for war 鈥攖he goals of October 7th were not limited to attacking Israeli military bases, but also killing and kidnapping ordinary Israelis. The civilian victims in Israel weren’t secondary to the war objective鈥攖hey were the war objective. Hamas may claim that civilians were not the target because it counters their religious beliefs, but proof lies in the human carnage that their own armed military left behind.
As Gaza’s ruling government, what remains of Hamas鈥 leadership bears individual responsibility for these crimes of war. While Gaza’s precise legal status remains contested and International Criminal Court jurisdiction unclear, those who ordered and executed attacks targeting civilians may well face charges in due course.
The suffering in Gaza is immeasurable. Yet devastation continues partly because those fighting alongside Hamas, or volunteering as human shields, make daily choices prolonging the conflict. The protests recently heard on Gaza’s streets need to grow louder. Civilian rejection of Hamas is the best foundation for Gaza’s future.
A term we rarely hear in mass media reporting鈥攂ut one that would have the most immediate humanitarian impact鈥攊s surrender. Calling for Hamas鈥檚 surrender is the clearest and most humane demand right now. It is the fastest path to returning hostages, stopping the bombing, and getting aid into Gaza. This message needs to be heard loudly and consistently by anyone who truly wants to stop the suffering. And our message should not be 鈥渂ring them home,鈥 which implies the burden is on us, but 鈥渟end them home,鈥 which places responsibility where it belongs.
However much demand there is within Israel for its government to do more, the return of the hostages is not Israel’s ultimate responsibility. The responsibility for this war crime lies squarely with Gaza and its leadership.
Gaza, under Hamas, has not surrendered and repeatedly states its intention to attack Israel again. In such circumstances, Israel’s right to self-defense remains justified until its enemy rescinds its threats and capitulates.
In the meantime, Israel remains accountable to international humanitarian law, especially as Israel announces its widening war goals.听 The recent shooting of Red Crescent aid workers adds emphasis to the need for accountabilty, not withstanding the fog of war that surrounds such incidents. 听Gaza must be held to the same standards. Taking hostages is a war crime. Calls for a ceasefire before hostages are returned implicitly legitimizes hostage-taking as an acceptable act of war. It is not.
Eighteen months into this terrible war, choosing our words has never been more important. “Surrender and send them home”says it all, and gets it done.
Stephen D. Smith is CEO of Memory Workers and Executive Director Emeritus of USC Shoah Foundation.听
Reshaping the Narrative: Words and Terminology in the Israel-Gaza War
Stephen Smith
It has been 18 months since the horrific events of October 7th. As the war between Israel and Gaza enters a new phase, the language we employ carries increasingly important implications. Words matter鈥攏ot just within narrative wars shaping public opinion, but for diplomatic, jurisprudential, and historical reasons. Using the wrong words deepens the crisis; finding the right words could end it sooner.
The prevailing global narrative casts Israel as the instigator while overlooking a crucial fact: Gaza through its leadership, Hamas, initiated this war through a coordinated attack on military and civilian targets on October 7th, 2023. This attack was a premeditated “casus belli”鈥攁 deliberate provocation that formally triggered an “International Armed Conflict” governed by “International Humanitarian Law.”
This war is not between Israel and Hamas, but between Israel and the territory of Gaza. As Gaza’s designated authority, Hamas acts on behalf of its people. Hamas positions itself as fighting for the freedom of their community, but they’ve been in authority in Gaza since 2007. Their war goal is control territory outside of their jurisdiction, which they have not rescinded since October 7th 2023, prolongs thereby prolonging the conflict in Gaza.
Israel is not at war with Gazan civilians or with Palestinians writ large. Gaza represents two million of the 15 million people who identify as Palestinian worldwide. When the war is framed as a struggle for all Palestinians, it is a dangerous call to expand the conflict well beyond Gaza.
While many in the West hear 鈥楩ree Palestine鈥 as a cry for justice, the slogan often fuels Hamas 鈥 a militant organization that thrives on continued conflict. 鈥楩ree Palestine鈥 and 鈥楻iver to the Sea鈥 are not an anti-war message, and serve as rallying cries for the expansion of war.
It鈥檚 essential to separate support for the dignity and safety of people living in Gaza from language and actions that empower those who seek Israel鈥檚 destruction. I believe it鈥檚 possible to advocate for the lives and rights of Palestinians without threatening the lives and safety of Jews.
Hamas operatives have been labeled ‘terrorists’. Although Hamas is designated as a terror organization by many countries, referring to them as ‘terrorists’ absolves their actions of full accountability according to听 international law. Terrorism typically refers to individuals and small groups acting on an ad hoc basis. What happened on October 7th was a meticulously planned military operation ordered by Gaza’s governing authority and overseen by its military command. It involved hundreds of highly trained military personnel. Whatever justification they give for these actions, it makes them fully accountable for crimes of war. It was not an isolated act of terrorism.
When viewed as a ‘casus belli’ 鈥 the cause for war 鈥攖he goals of October 7th were not limited to attacking Israeli military bases, but also killing and kidnapping ordinary Israelis. The civilian victims in Israel weren’t secondary to the war objective鈥攖hey were the war objective. Hamas may claim that civilians were not the target because it counters their religious beliefs, but proof lies in the human carnage that their own armed military left behind.
As Gaza’s ruling government, what remains of Hamas鈥 leadership bears individual responsibility for these crimes of war. While Gaza’s precise legal status remains contested and International Criminal Court jurisdiction unclear, those who ordered and executed attacks targeting civilians may well face charges in due course.
The suffering in Gaza is immeasurable. Yet devastation continues partly because those fighting alongside Hamas, or volunteering as human shields, make daily choices prolonging the conflict. The protests recently heard on Gaza’s streets need to grow louder. Civilian rejection of Hamas is the best foundation for Gaza’s future.
A term we rarely hear in mass media reporting鈥攂ut one that would have the most immediate humanitarian impact鈥攊s surrender. Calling for Hamas鈥檚 surrender is the clearest and most humane demand right now. It is the fastest path to returning hostages, stopping the bombing, and getting aid into Gaza. This message needs to be heard loudly and consistently by anyone who truly wants to stop the suffering. And our message should not be 鈥渂ring them home,鈥 which implies the burden is on us, but 鈥渟end them home,鈥 which places responsibility where it belongs.
However much demand there is within Israel for its government to do more, the return of the hostages is not Israel’s ultimate responsibility. The responsibility for this war crime lies squarely with Gaza and its leadership.
Gaza, under Hamas, has not surrendered and repeatedly states its intention to attack Israel again. In such circumstances, Israel’s right to self-defense remains justified until its enemy rescinds its threats and capitulates.
In the meantime, Israel remains accountable to international humanitarian law, especially as Israel announces its widening war goals.听 The recent shooting of Red Crescent aid workers adds emphasis to the need for accountabilty, not withstanding the fog of war that surrounds such incidents. 听Gaza must be held to the same standards. Taking hostages is a war crime. Calls for a ceasefire before hostages are returned implicitly legitimizes hostage-taking as an acceptable act of war. It is not.
Eighteen months into this terrible war, choosing our words has never been more important. “Surrender and send them home”says it all, and gets it done.
Stephen D. Smith is CEO of Memory Workers and Executive Director Emeritus of USC Shoah Foundation.听
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You鈥檙e Not a Bad 91传媒 Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
A Rabbi Explains What鈥檚 91传媒 About ‘The Odyssey’
Tu b’Av and Redemption
Mission to the 91传媒 Community of Ethiopia
LA28: Inside the Race to Host One of the World鈥檚 Biggest Sporting Events
The Myth of the Marxist Mishpacha
Professors Should Fight Campus Jew-Hatred as Educators, Not Bureaucrats
Framing the Faith of Maimonides
In this enriching new edition of the classic code of 91传媒 law, readers can delve deeply into the mind of Maimonides, from his analysis of the commandments to the controversies that have accompanied his writings, offering a window into the wisdom of one of our tradition鈥檚 preeminent thinkers.
Hope in Faith, Faith in Hope
Will Americans ever regain trust in our institutions? I think so.
Finding Communal Comfort
In the book of Isaiah, God calls the prophet to comfort the 91传媒 people. But we know this is really something we must do for one another.
Leaving Behind a Better World
The America my generation seems to be leaving our kids and grandkids is not safer nor saner, and it breaks my heart.
Boy George Releases Song Calling Out Israel鈥檚 Critics
The Culture Club singer shared a new song, 鈥淲e Will Dance Again,鈥 while calling out fellow musicians鈥 鈥渟elective memories鈥 and 鈥渕outhing like sheep.鈥
Was Our Golden Age Fool鈥檚 Gold?
We didn鈥檛 think that we were living in a 鈥淕olden Age,鈥 because it did not occur to us that what we were experiencing was only a temporary respite from centuries of animosity and intolerance.
Genocide Shmenocide
Since Israel evacuated Gaza in 2005, the Palestinian population has grown from 1.3 million to 2.1 million. In the West Bank, it has grown from 2.4 million to 3.4 million. If the Israelis were hellbent on committing genocide, it鈥檚 one of the most epic failures in military history.
Bibi鈥檚 Visit: Spin in the Air, Facts on the Ground
From Trump鈥檚 standpoint, the nuclear issue has been overtaken by the bedeviling problem of the Strait of Hormuz. What Trump sees now in Iran is a mess, not a victory.
The Obsession with Israel Is Becoming Creepy
The world鈥檚 fanatical fixation with a group that is less that 0.2 percent of the world鈥檚 population has crossed the boundaries of moral vocabulary and into creepiness.
What Will It Take?
An open revolt for 91传媒 rights and protections is going to have to come from Jews finally making demands and fighting back鈥攐r not at all.
Mamdani Needs to Pay a Price for Harming Jews
It鈥檇 be one thing if Mamdani were a lowly Israelophobe with a few hundred followers. But he鈥檚 not. He鈥檚 mayor of the city with the world鈥檚 largest 91传媒 population.
Rabbis of LA | Rabbi Geller鈥檚 Feminist Education
Third of three parts
Rabbi Artson Honored by WLCJ, Mem Global鈥檚 Embark Names Executive Director
Notable people and events in the 91传媒 LA community.
I Can鈥檛 Always 鈥 A poem for Parsha Va鈥檈tchanan
You Can鈥檛 Always Get What You Want came out the year after I was born.
A Bisl Torah 鈥 Senseless versus Sensible
The 9th of Av is an annual reminder to look inward and ask if any hatred has taken root within our hearts.
Moment in Time: Tisha B鈥橝v – A Time to Comfort
Poussin鈥檚 Menorah Chimes Without Jews at Midnight
Print Issue: Haredim at War | July 24, 2026
The Haredim who break out of their bubbles to join the IDF are often caught between faith, family and country. Here are some of their stories.
The Inversion of History
Molly Crabapple has written a work of great inversion and of ultimate betrayal.
From 鈥楾he Chosen鈥 to 鈥業maging Torah鈥: Jeremy Kagan鈥檚 Journey to Bring Torah to Life
For the director/artist, creating images inspired by Torah is a way of engaging with the stories, ideas and interpretations that have shaped 91传媒 life for thousands of years.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.